(a) Authorization and announcement for project implementation - Project name: J project implementation authorization and announcement: K (23 December 2015) and the same L (15 November 2016) at the time of the previous week - Project implementer: Jeonju market;

B. On December 22, 2016, the Jeollabuk-do Regional Land Tribunal of Jeollabuk-do.

The ruling of expropriation - The object of expropriation was the owner of the net A and net M owned N,O, and P, and died on April 6, 2007 before the ruling.

Land indicated in the separate sheet in the column for the location, lot number, and size of each land (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) - The date of commencement of expropriation: February 14, 2017 - Compensation: The amount of money indicated in the column for “the amount of adjudication of expropriation” in the separate sheet shall be as follows:

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation with a large appraisal corporation and a national appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal of expropriation”)

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 22, 2017 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) - Details of the adjudication: The Plaintiffs’ compensation for losses as stated in attached Form 1 in attached Form 1; Each increase - An appraisal corporation: A certified public appraisal corporation in which the Institute of Bankruptcy and the Institute of the Resolution of the Resolution of the Resolution of the Resolution of the Resolution of the Resolution of the Resolution of the Resolution of the Compensation for Losses (hereinafter “appraisal of the Resolution”): A certified public appraisal corporation in which

D. The Court’s entrustment of appraisal to Q Q (hereinafter “court’s appraisal”) - Compensation for losses: The amount indicated in the “court’s appraisal amount” column in the annexed sheet is as follows.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including identification numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the court's entrustment of appraisal to Q Q, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment

A. The compensation for losses on each of the lands of this case is too low when compared to the value of each of the lands of this case, and thus does not reach a reasonable compensation. Thus, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiffs the remaining money after deducting the compensation for the adjudication from the court appraisal compensation which is the legitimate compensation for each of the lands of this case.

(b) a determination of compensation;