"2017 Highest 2755" case

1. On July 2012, the criminal defendant against the victim C is entitled to receive a full payment from the E office located in the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and from the victim C when he/she lends five million won to the victim C for the reason that the circumstances of the company make it difficult.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the defendant did not have any other punishment in the company accompanying at the time, and there was no intention or ability to pay it even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the overdue use of the card.

On August 2, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 5 million from the damaged party to the Saemaul Treasury Account in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 2016, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim F is the date when the Victim F, operated by the Victim F, at the Seoul Seoul branch office, G Co., Ltd.’s office operated by Ansan-si, Seoul, showing the Victim F, “the establishment of the Basic Plan for the I Site Development Project,” which is located at Sasi H, with the Victim F’s approval from the Marine Affairs Department, and approval for the business from

The business executor shall provide the J fishing village fraternity, which is the side of the business executor, with KRW 100,000 as business expenses, and 20,000,000 won has been paid first, and an additional 80,000,000 won has been paid, the authority to select the corporation for the project may be received.

It is intended to conclude a telecommunications construction contract immediately after the conclusion of the contract on construction of telecommunications.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, there was no fact that the Defendant paid KRW 20 million to the fishing village fraternity under the pretext of operating expenses from the injured party, and there was no intention or ability to receive telecommunications construction works for the said construction site as agreed to use the said money as operating expenses and agreed to the injured party.

On March 10, 2016, the Defendant was the Defendant’s agricultural bank account with Defendant wife K around March 10, 2016, and KRW 20 million as business expenses.