No. 1 of seized evidence No. 2 shall be from Defendant A, seized by Defendant A.

Defendant

B, Defendant A, in collusion with a name-free person, intended to commit the phishing fraud, which assumes a false name of an unspecified number of employees of financial institutions in Korea.

Therefore, in order for the victim to misrepresent himself/herself as a financial institution staff and obtain a loan, he/she shall send money to the victim to a specific account as if the bank transaction performance is necessary, and the person under a certain name assumes the D staff of the new export-purchase agency and assumes the account in the high seas, he/she will be paid a refund fee related to the above company's car trade.

The account provider had the account provider withdraw part of the money deposited by the victim, and the defendant B received the money from the account provider and delivered it to the account provider, and the defendant A collected the money by viewing the network at the scene of the crime.

On August 16, 2017, at least 10:30, in a place where it is impossible to know, the name-free person assumes the victim E an employee in spite of the absence of the intent or ability to make a loan to the victim, and in spite of his/her intention or ability to do so, he/she is allowed to make a loan by misrepresenting himself/herself to the victim E and making it possible to obtain a loan by raising the credit rating if he/she is transferred to another account with a low credit rating of the victim.

“The victim made a false statement,” and the member instructed the victim to deposit the sum of KRW 11 million in the Saemaul Treasury’s account (G) in the name of F, and ordered the F to withdraw KRW 9 million out of that amount.

Defendant

B At the point of Kimpo-si in around 11:00 on the same day, at the point of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the victim's cash amounting to KRW 9,00,000,000, which he withdrawn from the above F, and the defendant A was able to look at the police officer's location while committing the above crime.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion to deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim by deceiving the total amount of 11 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.