Defendant 850,000 won for the applicant for compensation, and 390,000 won for the applicant for compensation, to K.

3. On March 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the Victim’s “Slurlice Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant: (b) had no intent or ability to pay the rent even if he/she borrowed a vehicle from the said company; (c) had shown the attitude that he/she would be able to pay the rental fee to the Defendant, who is an employee of the victim company; and (d) had concluded a car rental agreement with the victim and used a car rental agreement with the victim, but did not pay the rental fee of KRW 1,50,000,000,000,000 for the rental fee.

4. Around March 27, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document, or the uttering of a private document, and the Defendant forged an application for new transaction under the name of the above O, which is a private document on rights and obligations, by signing the name of the aboveO on the column of resident numbers, stating “In the resident number column,” “In the resident number column, the number column” 11-****** after entering the name of the aboveO in the column of the applicant at each bottom and signing it on the private document in the name of the aboveO, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

On the same date and at the same place, the Defendant continued to submit a forged new transaction application to a staff-in-charge who is aware of the fact that the application was duly completed.

5. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the above Paragraph 4, presented the O’s driver’s license under the name of the Commissioner of the Daejeon Police Agency, which was a stolen official document, and presented it as the Defendant’s driver’s license.

[2014 Highest 894] The Defendant, around February 18, 2014, runs the Mamoto, which is located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, to the Internet NAVV “China” camera by using computers.