1. On January 15, 2014, around 12:50, the Defendant damaged the victim’s above vehicle to repair cost of KRW 2,607,138, 200, when he collected stones and strawings from the main set and front glass of the F Sppart motor vehicle parked by the victim E, etc.

2. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time as, and at the same place as, the above “paragraph (1)”, committed assault against the victim when the victim G (the age of 66) was frightened with the victim’s frighten and continued to breathing with frighten, and was frightened by frightening the fright of the victim’s face. 3. On January 15, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties and damaged public goods at the same place as the above “paragraph (1)” at around 13:00 on January 15, 2014, at the police box of the House of the Government Police Station of the Republic of Korea, which was dispatched after receiving 112 report to the Defendant and tried to arrest him as a flagrant offender, removed the part of the above I’s shoulder shoulder fright, and removed the above part of the J’s fright.

The Defendant continued to catch three the antennas installed on the back of the patrol police station No. 61 of the 161, to display the antenna, and set the back part of the patrol police station.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers with respect to the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, has harmed the utility of public goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer in relation to G, I, J and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning estimates of repair costs;

1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reasons for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders are the obstruction of performance of official duties on January 28, 200.