beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.08.11 2014고단4282

청소년보호법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the trade name "D".

No person shall sell drugs harmful to juveniles under the age of 19 years to juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 00:15 on October 13, 2014, the Defendant sold a total amount of KRW 33,000,00 to E (16 years of age, South) and four (4) juveniles, namely, drugs harmful to juveniles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. A written statement of the F;

1. Control note;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing business reporting certificates;

1. Article 59 of the relevant Act on Criminal facts and Articles 59 subparagraph 6 and 28 (1) of the Protection of Juveniles Eligible for the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that "the defendant did not verify the identification card with the juvenile E and four persons at the time of the crime of this case, and sold the alcohol to them, but he knew of his undergraduate students, and four other persons, including E, did not know of his undergraduate students."

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, it is reasonable to view that the Defendant and four other persons are aware of the fact that they may not be adults. A.

The control manual prepared by the police officer who first controlled the instant business establishment stated that “The police officer sent out after receiving a report and asked five high school students to enter the same, but he stated that the principal officer entered and ordered the drinking without verifying his identification card, and the Defendant also acknowledged the fact that he provided alcoholic beverages to juveniles.”

B. The Defendant and her husband F are referred to as “E” in this Court in investigative agencies.

The parents of the college shall be well aware of the college life.