beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.02 2015고단3788

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment of eight months, and by a fine of seven million won, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is equipped with four massage rooms, cameras, employees waiting rooms, and kitchens under the ground of the building located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, and operates a marina business with the trade name of “E”.

On March 25, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 80,000 from B, who was found to be a customer at the above business establishment on March 23, 2015, and received KRW 80,000 from B, who was an employee of the above business establishment, 40,000, and F had F engage in similar sexual intercourse in a way of cutting and shaking B’s sexual organ by hand.

As a result, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic by the aforementioned method from December 2, 2013 to March 25, 2015.

2. Defendant B

A. On March 25, 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 80,000 from the “E” under the underground “E” of the building located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and had F, a female employee of the said business, knife and s the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand, and engaged in one-time similarity with the said F.

B. On March 25, 2015, around 23:40 on March 25, 2015, the Defendant, at the underground “E” of the building located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, under the suspicion of engaging in sexual traffic, controlled against G of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo Police Station and the slope H, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Young Military Police Station, and the said slope H, who expressed the desire to “grings, spaws,” and carried out the said slope H’s bath as his hand.

In addition, the defendant, by hand, was plucked by a plucker, plucked up, and sawd with the hand of the above slope I.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the control of sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of each police protocol to H and I;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

B. Defendant B: Arrangement of commercial sex acts.