In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the reputation, which is the protection of the legal interests of the offense of insult, by using as evidence a non-Admissibility of evidence or evidence without probative value, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

And the court below dismissed the defendant's request for the appointment of defense counsel in this case which is not a requisite attorney-at-law

Therefore, the lower court erred by infringing on the Defendant’s right to a fair trial, as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.