When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On October 01, 2018, the Defendant, at around 01:00, received meals equivalent to KRW 38,000, the sum of KRW 38,000, from the victim D, who is the owner of the above restaurant, by multiplying the said restaurant by her knowledge, even though he/she did not have the ability or intent to pay the purchase at the “C” restaurant located in Kimpo-si B, Kimpo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;