2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable condition such as the confession of the crime of this case and the fact that there is a family member who will support the crime of this case. However, the act of trading an automobile without the registration of automobile management business, such as the crime of this case, without the registration of the automobile management business, is not only prejudicial to the transaction and distribution order of the automobile, but also there is a need to strictly punish a large number of victims because such large-sized vehicle is abused as a means of crime or tax evasion, and there is a high risk of mass production. The defendant seems to have committed a crime in light of the transaction period, frequency of trading, transaction amount (including about 930 million won), transaction amount (including about 930 million won), transaction amount, transaction amount (including about 234 times) and business size. The defendant's criminal proceeds derived from the crime of this case can not be seen to have been many, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished three times as the same crime of this case during the period of this case, the defendant continued to commit the crime of this case, despite being sentenced to imprisonment and punishment of this case.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.