On November 22, 2020, the Defendant driven the upper 21:30 on the upper oba, and led to the passage of the front road in front of the building in the Northern-gu Seoul Metropolitan City along the two-lanes of the two-lanes in the direction of the upper gate in the direction of the upper gate in the width of the Road Traffic Authority.

Since the vehicle prior to the same direction has changed its course into one lane, in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver, and accurately manipulating the steering direction and the system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through as it was, and the victim D (son, 22 years old) who changed the course to a one-lane due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure, received the part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle after the left-hand side of the hurbed vehicle and the part of the hurb.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence.

2. Under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the facts charged above shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim pursuant to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

According to the records, since the above victim submitted a written agreement stating that he does not want punishment for the defendant after the institution of the prosecution, and withdrawn his intention of punishment, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.