도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Punishment of the crime
On September 6, 2008 and September 9, 2008, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol twice and received a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on December 8, 2008.
On March 12, 2014, at around 01:00, the Defendant driven a B B B B mountain-est car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.155% under the influence of alcohol on the 1km section from the front of the main road of the “Irish,” located in the Pyeong-dong in the East Sea to the front road of the Nicesaw that was located in the Dong-si in the East Sea in the same day at around 02:40 on the same day.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;
1. Previous records of judgment: Reference references, such as criminal records, and criminal investigation reports (verification of records of drinking driving twice) and the application of statutes;
1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense.
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has been sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million on or around September 2008 by a defendant who committed a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of hallucinogenic substances). In particular, even though the defendant committed the instant crime on or around March 2014 after having been sentenced to a punishment on around September 201 due to a violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act of 201, it should be criticized that the defendant committed the instant crime. However, even though the defendant had been punished several times due to the violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act in the process of putting his/her abluence after leaving his/her abluence due to the difficult and injury in the past, it seems that he/she had been faithfully living in the society, preventing the instant crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act of the past year on or around September 208.