When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 01:00 on January 14, 2015, the Defendant, at the family house located in the 2nd floor of the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu Suwon-gu, 2015, reported that the former husband was found and frighted, and the circumstances leading up to the C District of the Daegu Suwon-gu, Police Station, which called to the site after receiving a report, demanded the Defendant to leave and leave the site, and thereby, the Defendant her hand her hand her flad with “the starting of the launch, the aged and the head of the gu,” and her hand her flab and her flabed with the flab.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported cases by the Inspector D, who is a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the current status of work log and reported case settlement;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant’s act of violence obstructing the performance of official duties by police officers; (b) the Defendant did not commit the crime of this case; (c) the Defendant committed the crime of this case; (d) the Defendant did not have any criminal record other than the fine once, and (e) did not have any other criminal record other than the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age