beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2014.08.20 2014고단440

상해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 24, 2014, at around 14:40, the Defendant: (a) boarded a taxi driven by the victim B (the age of 59) in the vicinity of the fireworks that are located in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si; and (b) arrived at the Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si.

Since then, the defendant was shouldered by the victim's arrival at the destination, and the defendant, who was satis, was satisfying the victim's right face of the victim two times in drinking, and the part of the victim's right face was satisfy with the hand floor once.

이어서 피고인은 피해자가 피고인의 폭행을 피하기 위하여 위 택시에서 하차한 후 위 아파트 단지 안에 있던 이동식 닭튀김 판매점 앞으로 이동하자, 피해자를 뒤쫓아가 피해자의 멱살을 잡아밀어 그 곳에 있던 가마솥 쪽으로 넘어뜨려 가마솥에 끓고 있던 기름이 피해자의 머리, 어깨, 등 부분에 쏟아지게 하였다.

As a result, the defendant put the victim a 2-lane image of the body room that requires about 4 weeks of treatment.

2. On March 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was arrested as a flagrant offender for the crime of injury, such as the description of paragraph (1), on the front of the Heungdong-gu Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (b) was escorted to the cell of the Heungdong-gu Police Station.

Then, around March 24, 2014, the Defendant took the attitude that he would cause harm to the body of the Defendant, such as “Awch” in the above detention room, and walking with the entrance door of the detention room, and avoiding disturbance.

Therefore, in order to protect the life and body of the defendant, the police slope E, a police officer of the above police station, attempted to take the knife of the defendant's hand in his hand, and the defendant, in his hand, fell off the Knife on the floor by breaking the grane of the above E, and used the knife to cut off the knife E.

Accordingly, the defendant is justified in relation to the custody of police officers.