성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following: (a) summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (unfair sentencing) recognized the Defendant’s error; (b) the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable to order the Defendant to complete sexual assault treatment programs for a period of one year and six months or 40 hours; and (c) order to disclose personal information for a period of three years or more.
2. Determination
A. The crime of this case is found to have committed the crime of this case with a view to installing a camera at the victim's house in front of the defendant's house. The crime of this case is found to have committed the crime of this case by entering the password, which was discovered through the entrance, installed in the front corridor, before the victim's house, in the entrance, and installed in the entrance, so that the victim's house can intrude into the victim's house and put the victim's house at the entrance, and then the victim's house-based camera was exposed to the front door of the TV, which was purchased in advance at the entrance, after taking the direction of the victim's house-based image, and then the victim's cell phone was taken at the victim's house-based window, and the defendant's cell phone was taken at the victim's house, and it seems to have committed the crime of this case without any special reasons to be found to have been committed by the court below during the period of this case's imprisonment with prison labor for 16 years, and the defendant's age and mental impulse was considered to be considered.