beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.12.07 2020고단4356

폭행

Text

All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is in no position and Defendant B is a company member.

Defendant

A around 03:00 on June 20, 2020, Defendant A, who had been in the Dong-gu Daejeon, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and the owner of the business and the owner of the business within “D,” was defective in the victim B (the 32 years of age, the son) who was in compliance with the crub, “Isn is not the parent?” The victim’s inside part of the victim’s inner part of the crub was fl, and the victim’s flub was assaulted by the victim’s internal part of the crub because the crud part was flad by the victim.

B. Defendant B is above Defendant B.

In the East-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and near the F, women-friendly job offers victims G (20 years of age, women-friendly job offers) of the above A was assaulted by taking out the above A's bags, her hand, and her hand by cutting off the part of the victim's booms, and her booms over the floor.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. On September 11, 2020 after the prosecution of this case, the victim G as stated in the facts charged expressed the intent that the victim G does not want to be punished against Defendant B, and on October 30, 2020, the victim B as stated in the facts charged does not want to be punished against Defendant B.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;