If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

From February 2, 2012, the Defendant operated a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name "C" in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Btel 905 and 1323. On May 1, 2012, in collusion with D, the Defendant: (a) leased each of the above officetels at the said sexual traffic business establishment; (b) employed D as the head of office; and (c) paid 140,000 won to the male grandchildren who had contacted themselves as the sexual traffic women; and (c) paid 90,000 won to the said E and F as the price for the sexual traffic; and (d) Defendant D was working as the head of the said business establishment; (c) received the price for the sexual traffic from the male grandchildren; and (d) provided guidance for the sexual traffic business establishment after receiving the price for the sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the protocol of police interrogation, protocol of seizure, and list of seizure to E, F, G, and D;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act of confiscation;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;