beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고합430

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(강간등상해)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for fifteen years.

The seized crime prevention guards (Evidence No. 1), amnestys (Evidence No. 2), one amnestys (Evidence No. 2), and one.

Reasons

Criminal facts

and the facts constituting the cause of the request for attachment order [criminal facts]

1. The Defendant for robbery, rape, and the person subject to a request to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) committed robbery on September 30, 2006 at around 15:30, in front of the house of the victim C (in women, 53 years old) located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and invaded upon the victim’s residence by opening a small crime prevention window, and intrusion on the victim’s house through the window.

The Defendant discovered that the victim was locked at the inside of the victim, boomed the victim's hand and her hair with the victim's clothes, and prevented the Defendant from resisting the victim's eye and with hearing tape. The Defendant took 130,000 won in cash from the water reservoir located therein.

In addition, the Defendant had sexual intercourse once with the victim by mind of having the victim engage in sexual intercourse with the victim's panty, cutting the string of the victim's bridge, cutting off the victim's panty.

As above, the Defendant took property from the victim and raped the victim.

2. Around 14:30 on August 16, 2012, the Defendant, who violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Rape, Injury by Rape, etc.) and attempted robbery, was in front of the victim D (in women, 41 years of age) located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City. Around 14:30 on August 16, 2012, the Defendant invaded the victim’s residence by cutting down the crime prevention and singing

The defendant found that the victim was divingd at the inside of the victim, she sleeped the victim's side flick, she slicked the victim's clothes in the victim's place, and she did not resist against the victim's losses by returning them back to the victim's losses.

Although the defendant colored the victim's embankment, he did not discover but failed to do so.

In addition, the defendant tried to have a panty sexual intercourse with a panty of the female, but the victim tried to have a panty sexual intercourse with the defendant, but the defendant tried to keep the victim's panty in the process of the panty and resisting the defendant with the right to the defendant, and to control the victim who resisted in the process.