The Defendant: (a) had D engage in real estate consulting work; (b) had D enter into a disguised marriage with E, a multi-child apartment in the capacity of multi-child; (c) purchased F apartment in the capacity of multi-child; and (d) sold it in preference to the above F2 complex 202 dong 203 / 203 / (e.g., F apartment; hereinafter referred to as “F apartment”); and (c) sold the difference by a device, in collusion with the suspension of indictment on the same day; and (d) offered D and the above D at a coffee shop in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 4, 2014, the right to sell the above F apartment is a special right to purchase the apartment under the pretext of the above D and E, and the right to purchase the apartment under the pretext of false marriage is the victim’s right to purchase the apartment and to purchase it at least 100 billion won without knowledge of the fact that it was a defect in the right to purchase it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of K witness K;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by the prosecution (including the part concerning the J, H, and I statement);

1. Each police interrogation protocol against D, G, and J;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement concerning I and K;

1. Copies of receipts, copies of housing sale contract, certified copies of resident registration certificate, copies of waiver of apartment rights, copies of rejection of transfer, copies of application for parcelling-out, details of application for parcelling-out (certificate No. 163), and application

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the reasons for sentencing choice of imprisonment.