At around 06:00 on May 29, 2015, the Defendant thought that the Defendant was in the D cafeteria where he had the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the same-sex disorder, and that he was in the D cafeteria where he was working for the Defendant in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and that he was subject to consideration from other employees, such as the victim E (the age of 64) and applied the entrance to other employees, and interfere with the preparation of the restaurant business of the employees, such as the victim, etc., by opening the entrance, and taking a bath in front of the entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (record nine pages);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 10 (2) and (1) and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act, which are legally mitigated;

3. A fine of 250,000 won to be suspended;

4. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in cases of conversion of KRW 100,000 per day) of the Criminal Act into a workhouse.

5. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (including the fact that the defendant is in a profound radius and the fact that the crime of this case was committed in a state of mental disorder) is above the above Article