If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 11:40 on July 24, 201, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant located in the Chungcheongbuk-si, was a separate company from the victim D Co., Ltd., Ltd., and published a false statement on the Internet Kafbook, stating that “The Defendant’s management owner F, G, retired on October 2008, and planned to dispose of the company, and 1.3 billion won in addition to the National Tax Service’s tax, transferred personal and material resources to Daeam as if it were a new company and operated as if it were a new company, and as a single member, there is no relationship with E, there is damage to the legal network.”

Accordingly, the defendant spreads false facts, thereby damaging the victim D's credit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of some of the police officers against the accused (including the H substitute part);

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Business registration certificate, corporate register, etc.;

1. Sorizontal screen pictures;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to submit supplementary evidence;

1. Article 313 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine (Consideration of crimes, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;