However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 25, 2014, at around 00:40, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant that the Defendant’s daily activity had stolen female toilets on the front of the “Cjundong-gu, Cheongju-si,” and assaulted the Defendant’s chest in his hand, saying, “I wished to ask the victim E and F, a police officer belonging to the D Zone D District of the Cheongju Police Station D District, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-gu, who was called the Defendant, to be informed of the location of the daily activity; (b) the instant E, “I am, after the police officer had been doing so, after he was doing so; and (c) assaulted the said E’s chest by hand, and knife the F’s hand to restrain it.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. A written statement prepared by the defendant

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written E;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant reflects the error,

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;