The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Defendant

A is the business title of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Center for the Removal of "D", and the owner of the E4.5t Truck, and the defendant B is the person who operates the above removal center with the defendant A, and the F is the driver of the above cargo truck, who is employed by the defendant.

Although the owner or user of a private-use truck is not allowed to provide or rent a private-use truck for the purpose of transporting it for money, the Defendants used the above truck to transport the removals of the customers of the said center.

Defendant

B entered into a transportation contract with G, which is a customer, to receive KRW 500,000,00,000, and the Defendant A provided the above truck and provided the F with the truck, which used the above truck from 14:20 on November 23, 2012 to 101, Dongcheon-gu H apartment from 109 to 100,000,000.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide private-use truck for the purpose of transportation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and F

1. Each police protocol against the Defendants and G

1. A written statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. A detailed statement of passbook transactions, a name tag, a copy of an automobile registration certificate, and a copy of business registration certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 67 Subparag. 5 and Article 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse (or among the defendants);

1. A provisional payment order [Defendants] Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;