When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 20:40 on December 16, 2016, the Defendant demanded that the Victim D (Fran, 52 years of age) undergo on credit to the Victim D, and that the Defendant refuses to demand on credit to the Victim, but the Defendant made the demand on the part of the Victim’s refusal to demand on the part of the Victim.

“In large sounds,” referring to the expression “Is the customer who had been in place, would be able to see, and the defect “Is the governance”;

The victim interfered with the victim's syke business by force, such as neglecting customers who want to enter the syke with the disturbance, such as taking a bath, etc. with the large sound, and neglecting the victim's syke business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on reports on occurrence of accidents;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment (the choice of punishment: Request for formal trial against a summary order);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;