However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, as the owner of a halog automobile, is a person who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with Samsungsung Disaster Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”).

around 13:55 on May 2, 2017, the Defendant was parked twice after halogen cars at the parking lot for apartment buildings located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 407 (Regular Dong Dong-do).

C The key of the C-owner D-Wz's car to contact with the borrower has been driven by the above B-Wz's car, and the X-gu's car was parked in the same way as the vehicle was moved by the driver, which was not balke due to occupational negligence, to get the trees in the nearby a parking lot.

The Defendant was able to drive a car in the context of the accident to C, the owner of the passenger car in the event of the accident.

"Falsely," and at the same place in around 14:08 on the same day, the accident occurred where "Bomb car was driven by halogen car," and "Denz car was received."

"Along with the false term, an insurance receipt was made, and the victim's company paid 12,186,300 won of insurance money to C on May 27, 2017 as vehicle repair expenses.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired insurance money from a third party by insurance fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written request for automobile insurance money, a written request for automobile insurance money, an accident report, and a written consent for the payment of insurance money;

1. Automobile photographs;

1. Recording records;

1. Reports on internal accidents (Statement made in C by a vehicle owner of Dbenz);

1. Investigation report (C telephone call of a witness);

1. A verification center for automobile insurance coverage;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the Motor Vehicle Registration Register (B);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts and Article 8 of the Special Act on the Prevention of Fraud of Insurance Contract (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order is that the punishment of the crime of this case is not less complicated in light of the content of the crime of this case and the amount of insurance proceeds.

However, the defendant.