beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.03 2017가합2799

손해배상(기)등

Text

1. The committee for countermeasures against school violence at H High Schools operated by Defendant School Foundation D among the instant lawsuits is the autonomous committee for school violence in 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A is a student who was enrolled in the first half of H High School as of 2015, and Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.

On the other hand, Defendant D (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) is a school foundation that operates H high schools, etc., Defendant E constituted the H High School School Violence Countermeasures autonomous committee (hereinafter “instant autonomous committee”) in 2015 as the principal of H High School at the time of 2015. Defendant F was the principal of the said school at the time of the said school, and Defendant G was the principal of the said school, and was the executive secretary of the instant autonomous committee at the time of the said school.

B. On June 5, 2015, the instant autonomous committee held a meeting in relation to the same agenda as indicated in [Attachment 1], and decided to request the head of the H High School to take the following measures against four students, including the Plaintiff, for the reason that the Plaintiff and four students, including the Plaintiff, A, J, and K (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiff A, etc.”) exercised school violence against L, M, N,O, and P (hereinafter collectively referred to as “victims”).

[Attachment 2] The Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence, which is included in the table 2, is an abbreviation of the Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against School Violence.

[Presentation 1] Agenda 1 agenda: A summary of the case of reporting school violence to four persons, including Plaintiff A, etc. from April 17, 2015 to May 27, 2015: Plaintiff A, I, and J, on April 17, 2015, stated that Plaintiff A, and B, from April 17, 2015 to May 27, 2015, each or two persons of the classroom were able to take out the classroom, leading to an unbrupted conversation, leading the Plaintiff, J, and C, on the ground that they would encourage the Plaintiff to participate in a maternal trial, and had the victim students feel insult and humiliation by telephone and disclosed the contents of the telephone to other students, and transmitted the recording file to other relatives.