When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 5, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would deliver building materials to the victim on credit and pay the material price to the victim without molding it until February 20, 2014 when the construction work is completed,” at D stores operated by the victim C, which is located in Singju City B.

However, even if the defendant is supplied with construction materials on credit from the victim, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price to the victim until February 20, 2014.

Around February 5, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 8 kinds of construction materials from the victim, including 1,99,000 Twits, equivalent to the market price of KRW 1,00,00, and around February 11, 2014, the Defendant received 4,201,000 in total from the victim, such as receiving 8 kinds of construction materials, equivalent to the market price of KRW 2,202,00, such as 75T.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the letter of performance;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.