폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in light of the overall sentencing conditions in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal.
2. Determination of the grounds for appeal of this case is recognized as favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, the depth is divided, and the defendant raises two married daughters after divorce, the defendant does not seem to have the left side, and the defendant has the history of surgery on the left side of the bridge, which is not adequate to the present health.
However, the defendant has been sentenced to a suspension of execution on April 5, 2012 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.), which was sentenced to three years of suspension of execution on April 5, 2012, and has repeatedly committed the same crime during the suspension period of execution. The crime of this case is committed by the defendant who is obligated to protect and rear his/her child as a person with parental authority at the time of the crime of this case with a chain, which is a dangerous object, about 2 weeks of treatment. The crime of this case is committed by the victim, who is only 7 years of custody at the time of the defendant, and the nature and circumstances of the crime of this case are not good. The crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a deadly weapon, etc.) is committed against the punishment of this case, which was committed for more than 3 years and less than 1 year and 6 months, and thus, there is no reason to reduce the punishment of the defendant before and after the crime of this case without any additional reduction of punishment.
3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.