공무집행방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On October 15, 2016, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant was arrested of a flagrant offender at the (PC) box located in the (PC) box located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si; and (c) the Defendant was requested to go to the police box to go to the police box to undergo an investigation after being arrested of a flagrant offender at the (PC) box located in the nearby (PC); and (d) the Defendant took the face of a patroler D with the right blue.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing mental and physical disorder such as a criminal investigation report (visual blive video and victim DNA statement - video trial);
1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime (elective of imprisonment);
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the following favorable circumstances):
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] No person who does not exist in the basic area (from June to January 4) (special sentencing person] (determination of sentence] (determination of sentence] in order to establish national legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish a crime against public authority, such as interference with the performance of official duties.
Even after the defendant is arrested by a flagrant offender, he/she assaults a police officer who has performed his/her legitimate duties in a drunken state without being familiar with others, and is punished by such crime.
No person shall be a favorable condition for drinking under the circumstances.
However, the defendant recognized his mistake and is in profoundly against himself.
Until now, only one fine has been punished so far, and there is no same criminal history.
In this context, the sentencing guidelines shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, motive, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.