If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant posted a statement on the fact that the victim D (year 28 years old, South) purchased a mobile phone on the Internet Nene E camera, and the Defendant sent 200,000 won to the account, regardless of the absence of an intent to sell an option interview mobile phone, on the part of the victim.

At around 10:35 on the same day, the Defendant got 200,000 won from the Busan Bank Account in the name of the Defendant and acquired it by deceiving the victim by the above method.

2. Around December 2012, the Defendant posted a letter that he sells a mobile phone on the Internet NAV E camera by using a computer located in Ulsan B, and the Defendant said that he would deliver KRW 300,000 to the account if he deposits KRW 300,000 to the account even though he did not intend to sell a mobile phone to the victim G who reported the fact that he did not intend to sell the mobile phone.

On December 27, 2012, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim through the foregoing method, received KRW 300,000 from the victim to the Busan Bank Account F in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on search, seizure, and verification warrant and CCTV image data;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;