A. Of the printed matters distributed by the Defendant, the part of the judgment of the lower court criticizes the Defendant that the Defendant deprived of the opportunity to receive vehicle subsidies by entering into a joint agreement with the vehicle independently without making an effort to fairly distribute the vehicle subsidies to G. ② The part is true or true as it recognizes the Defendant’s oral instruction of the head of the branch office of the higher group of the branch office that is recognized as his military superior, as an administrative order, or is erroneous and erroneous as a true fact, and such factual time of the Defendant’s above is justified as it is for the public interest.

Even if this part of the facts charged is false, or is for the public interest, the objective of this part of the charges is not recognized.

Even if the inducement of this case is distributed to 70 persons present at the meeting of the branch meeting at the second floor of the D building, and there is no performance.

B. According to the prosecutor 1) the statement of the victim of the misunderstanding of facts, the minutes of the branch and the official questions, etc., the part of the decision of the court below among the printed items distributed by the defendant is recognized to be false, and the part 3 and 4 of the decision of the court below is recognized to be false, and even if there are no false domestic facts, it is difficult to see that the purpose of public interest is recognized in light of the contents of

2) The sentence of the lower court that is unfair in sentencing (an amount of KRW 500,00) is too unhued and unfair.

2. Determination:

A. 1 Determination as to the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts

The lower court.