When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 2, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on December 2, 201, and confirmed on April 27, 201. On June 30, 2011, the court was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act, and confirmed as waiver of appeal on July 5, 201. On October 22, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud and became final and conclusive as waiver of appeal on October 23, 2015.

[Criminal Act] Defendant was the actual representative of D Co., Ltd. (business registration number E) with the head office set forth in Note C and 301 at the Government.

1. From June 2009 to December 12, 2009, the Defendant committed the crime related to the false sales invoice at the office of the said D Co., Ltd.: (a) although D Co., Ltd. did not supply goods or services to the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, in the agreement to make a settlement of accounts; (b) although D Co., Ltd. supplied goods or services to the Seosan, it prepared one copy of the false sales invoice as if it supplied goods or services in the amount of KRW 65,00,000,000 in the amount of supply, and issued one copy of the false tax invoice of KRW 72,00,000 in the amount of supply in the same manner within the same period.

2. The Defendant committed the crime related to the false purchase tax invoice at the above D Co., Ltd. office from June 2009 to December, 12, 2009, even though D Co. received goods or services from ELC Co., Ltd. located in Seocheon-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in spite of the fact that D Co. was supplied with goods or services, D Co., Ltd received two copies of the false purchase tax invoice as if D Co. received goods or services equivalent to KRW 10,750,00 from ELC Co., Ltd., the L Co. received two copies of the false purchase tax invoice in the same manner as he/she supplied goods or services in the same manner as he/she received the false purchase tax invoice of KRW 83,460,00 from his/her green trade.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Part of the witness G in the 8th public trial protocol (the defendant asks G to the representative in the name of D Co., Ltd.).