However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 31, 2014, around 04:30 on March 31, 2014, the Defendant ordered the “Esing” operated by the second victim D of the building C, Kimhae-si, to F, an employee of the Defendant ordered the delivery, beer, etc., and paid the liquor value.

However, in fact, there was no intention or ability to pay the drinking value even if the two states are ordered because they are not in possession of money or credit cards.

The Defendant received from F a total amount of KRW 200,000,000 from the market price.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 347 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) reflects the crime of this case, the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case is insignificant as 200,000