However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant appeared in and taken an oath as a witness of the fraud case against Defendant E of the above court No. 2013Kadan1439, Apr. 1, 2014, at the court of Suwon District Court, No. 302, Jun. 15, 2014, which was located in Ansan-ro 212, Sinyang-si, Sinyang-si, Sinyang-si, the Defendant gave testimony before the presiding judge of the above court of criminal3 single criminal punishment.

The Defendant stated that “I would like to refer to the question “I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am ‘I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am

However, in fact, F did not have made a statement to the Defendant that “The fact that money was paid to the Defendant (E) was purely lent, not in the name of the electronic equipment cost.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. The Defendant testified from F on the basis of the facts that he testified from F on the basis of investigation report (the filing of a copy of the record - the protocol of witness examination (part of the fifth protocol of trial), the written decision (13 order 1439), and the F did not have any circumstance to purchase electronic equipment from E at the time, and thus, did not have any perjury.

However, according to the above evidence, F did not say that F did not purely lend money to E to E, and in order to install air conditioners at the time.