beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2012.10.05 2012고합230

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Summary of facts charged

A. A. On March 2, 2010, the fraud Defendant: (a) around July 2, 2009, while operating the G Office in the Namyang-si, the Defendant: (b) from July 2, 2009, imported new shoes, clothing, etc. from the United States, etc. and supplied them to department stores, boats, etc.; (c) since March 2010, it was difficult for the Defendant to properly sell new shoes, clothing, etc. in his custody; (d) even if it was difficult for the Defendant to receive the original price, it was difficult for the Defendant to receive the money from the Victim H to receive the money for business purposes; (e) notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the money for the use of the money from the Defendant H, the Victim was taken to the warehouse located in the Republic of Korea, and then, the Defendant borrowed the money for business from the said warehouse to purchase the money for sale within one week; and (e) the Defendant transferred the money for sale within one million won under the name of the Defendant bank around 2000 million won.

B. The defendant in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) was already a contract to enable the victim to continue to import his knife in the U.S., and the import price is 25,000 won with our money, even if he was 25,00 won with tax and transportation expenses, even if he was able to receive the investment money from the victim due to the lack of business funds as stated in the above Paragraph (a) at the time, and was under circumstances where the defendant was unable to secure the knife of the knife and was unable to secure the knife.