However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the victim D (V, 64 years old) and the husband and wife relationship.

On March 2017, the victim discovered the Defendant’s influenite fact, and raised a strong resistance against the Defendant, and did not see the Defendant’s boomed. The Defendant was able to kill the Defendant by breaking up his mind that the Defendant had not undergone the cancer surgery too much much time, and was able to kill and commit suicide.

On March 27, 2017, at around 00:00, the Defendant entered ex officio the head of E Apartment Nos. 110 1102, 1102, and divingd victim’s head as evidence of “White” (3 cm in diameter, 33 cm in length).

In order to drive away from the house by shouldering the victim's head outside of the house, and to kill the victim by making several times the victim's head head flag, the victim's head flag continued. However, the victim did not go out of the house to the wind of 1103 flag, and the defendant attempted to live back to the above 1102 flag.

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to kill the victim as above, but attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Report on internal investigation (as for the victim's oral statement and state of damage, name change of seizure, material quality, robbery, etc., and as for the victim's oral statement and state of damage, observation and report on the direct observation of the back-to-door lab, etc

1. On-site reports, diagnosis reports, and opinions, replys to requests for appraisal, and inquiries about the DNA personal information of the detained suspect;

1. On-site photographs, victim photographs, closure photographs, etc.;

1. Application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes under subparagraph 1 of the seized evidence;

1. Relevant Article 254 of the Criminal Act, Articles 250 (1) and 250 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 subparag. 1 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing) of the Act on Reduction of Small Quantity (the top of the favorable reasons for sentencing).