손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
Judgment of the first instance.
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is a person working as an employee of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and the defendant is a child of C.
B. A around September 201, submitted to E an application for membership with respect to the Defendant (hereinafter “instant brokerage contract”), but a substantive act of marriage brokerage was not performed after the said contract.
C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on the Cheongju District Court 2012Gaju Branch 8991 (hereinafter “Cheongju District Court”), and on September 20, 2012 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff and the Defendant adjusted that “the Defendant shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 7,50,000 to the Plaintiff by October 20, 2012. If the said money is not paid by the said date, the amount unpaid plus 20% of the annual damages for delay from the date of payment to the date of full payment.”
On the other hand, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Cheongju District Court Decision 2012Gau12075 against Cheongju District Court. C filed a counterclaim against the Plaintiff as the same court 2013Gau383, and each of the above lawsuits was terminated upon withdrawal of the lawsuit.
E. The Plaintiff filed a complaint against C with the Cheongju District Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter “Cheongju Public Prosecutor’s Office”) on the crime of intimidation, etc., which was committed on August 22, 2012. However, the said Public Prosecutor’s Office was not prosecuted on the charge of intimidation, etc. < Amended by Act No. 11354, Nov. 20, 2012; Act No. 11354, Aug. 22, 2013; Act No. 13544, Nov. 2013; Act No. 1354, Mar. 2, 2013; Act No. 1388, Mar. 2, 2013; Act No. 13944, Aug. 22, 2013; Act No. 13984, Mar. 19
F. Meanwhile, on the other hand, the Plaintiff was indicted under the Chungcheong District Court Decision 2014Da425, 2015 Godan84, 2015 Godan39 (Merger), and 2015 Godan39 (Joint). On November 20, 2015, the said court sentenced the Plaintiff to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and among the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant was convicted.