beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2020.04.21 2020고단65

공무집행방해

Text

The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

except that the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years after the judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 17, 2019, the Defendant was dissatisfied with “C” in front of 00:15 Bo-si B, 00:32 on the same day with men who were unable to know on the way of “C”. “The Defendant, upon receipt of 112 report, was able to confirm the personal information and to invite them to return home from the police officer of the Bo-young Police Station D District police station, etc., who was called to the scene, and was able to see that “C spice, E E, E, E, and the Defendant was sprinked from the above E, and the Defendant was removed from the above E, and the Defendant was arrested as an act of obstruction of the performance of official duties, and tried to stop the above E’s spice at one time, and tried to remove the spice from the front of the police station, but the Defendant was able to request the above G police station to leave the front of the police station, which was called the front of the said G spice to the right.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the management of a sentry's disease.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs by cutting off on-site photographs, damaged parts of pictures, fa-cam campaigns, and CCTV images to the Fabags;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines for the instant crime is as follows, for the reason that there are crimes of conceptual concurrence with the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act.