beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.09.05 2014고단1104

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 5. 2. 20:50경 목포시 B에 있는 C화원 앞에서, 협박 관련 신고를 받고 출동한 목포경찰서 D파출소 소속 경찰관인 경사 E(46세)이 피고인에게 “D파출소에 근무하는 경사 E입니다. 신고를 받고 나왔는데 혹시 F씨인가요”라고 묻자 아니라는 대답에 “죄송합니다”라고 하였으나 피고인이 인상을 쓰며 “그래 너희가 경찰이냐”라고 한 다음, 이후 업무를 마치고 돌아가기 위해 112 순찰차량 운전석에 탑승한 목포경찰서 D파출소 소속 경찰관인 경사 G(33세)의 멱살을 잡아 끌어내리면서 “사진 찍어 놨다. 너희가 경찰이냐”라며 주먹으로 G의 얼굴을 2회 때리고, 이를 제지하던 E의 오른쪽 광대뼈 부위를 주먹으로 1회 때린 후 머리로 얼굴을 1회 들이받고, 발로 왼쪽 정강이를 2회 차 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the 112 reporting and withdrawal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Each of the following facts: - Since an ordinary concurrent relationship exists in the application of the victim photographic statute, the sentencing criteria shall not be applied. 1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning the crime (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that a suspended sentence is recognized as an offense, and that there is no record of punishment for violence, in addition to the punishment of a fine of one million won as a result of the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act in 199);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;