When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) taken a brush, which was placed on the street in front of the house located in the Dongdong-gu, U.S., U.S. on the front of the house; and (b) took a brush on 112 report, and sent out, the Defendant: (c) took a brush to restrain the Defendant; and (d) the defect to stop back to the Defendant; (c) the brush of this brush; (d) the brush; (d) the brush; (e) the brut; (e) the brut; (e) the brut; (e) the brut; (e) the brut; (e) the brut; and (e) the brut of the victim’s face; and (e) the victim’s brut the brush; and (e) the brut of the victim’s bridge.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not fit the nature of the instant crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the punishment as ordered is determined by taking account of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant reflects his mistake in depth; (b) the Defendant does not have the same power; and (c) the victimized police officers also seek the Defendant’s wife by committing the crime against the victimized police officers.