부정수급액반환처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s employees, who were recognized as the workplace skill development training course, applied for subsidies to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea (hereinafter “C”) and received subsidies of KRW 29,948,080,080 as indicated in the table “subsidies,” under the premise that the Plaintiff’s employees, as indicated below, entered into a contract for workplace skill development training by means of remote training for the number of trainees (hereinafter “instant training”), and 512 of the aforementioned trainees (hereinafter “the number of trainees in this case”) undergo the instant training normally and the instant training was completed by 512 of the “the number of trainees in completion” (hereinafter “the instant training courses”) on the premise that the aforementioned trainees meet the standards for completion of remote training (hereinafter “the “standards for completion”).
On September 26, 2013, the date of concluding a contract for the grant of the training entrustment contract (the date of the original payment of training expenses) for the number of trainees who completed the training period (the original payment date) shall be 10,136,000 on March 26, 2014; 136,00 on March 25, 200; 20. 5. 8. 26. 8. 15. 8. 15. 26. 15. 10,000 A bus workers and 181,360,000 on September 13, 2013 through December 13, 2014; 15. 8. 25. 25. 18. 25. 18. 26. 205. 18. 25. 18. 205
B. On March 17, 2017, the Defendant, on the ground that “this case trainees did not undergo the instant training and failed to meet the completion standards, and the Plaintiff applied for subsidies to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea and received them.” The Defendant’s amendment to the former Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (amended by Act No. 13902, Jan. 27, 2016) is below.