If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person engaged in agriculture and is a village resident such as the victim C(67 years of age).

The defendant asserts that the victim had broadcasted the content of defamation against the defendant to the village residents, but the victim denies it.

On October 25, 2011, the Defendant: (a) around 09:00 on the D Village 2 bridge of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si, the Defendant: (b) “In the event the victim was engaged in an operation to fluorize the rice,” the Defendant “in the event that the victim was fluort the fluort of the fluort of the fluort of the fluort of the fluort of the fluort of the victim’s fluort of the fluort of the victim,

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness C and E;

1. Part C of the second protocol of examination of suspect against the defendant

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. E's statement of fact;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of a complaint and an injury diagnosis report;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.