1. The Defendant, around 16:00 on March 28, 2014, ordered the victim D (E) to pay the alcohol value as if he/she had the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, and ordered the victim to pay the alcohol and alcohol. However, there was no intention or ability to pay the price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, was provided with approximately KRW 115,00 from the victim, namely, 115,00,000 from the victim’s seat.

2. On March 28, 2014, around 20:40, the Defendant ordered the Victim G management heading F in light of the victim G management level: (a) as if the Victim had the intent or ability to pay entertainment expenses; (b) as if the Victim had the intent or ability to pay entertainment expenses; and (c) did not have the intent or ability to pay the said amount.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement as above, and received from the victim one Dog-Sa, two 1 soldier, and two Dog-ri, which are equivalent to KRW 280,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each written statement of G and D;

1. Application of each receipt statute;

1. The crime of this case is a case in which the defendant obtained a total of about 400,00 won from the main points operated by the victims by the victim, and the defendant has not yet been punished at least 20,000 won due to the same criminal act, and the defendant has been punished at least 20,000 won due to the same criminal act and has been punished at least 20,000 won, even though a suspended sentence was rendered on around 2013, it is inevitable to sentence the defendant as to the crime of this case.

However, in light of the favorable circumstances such as the defendant's recognition of all crimes of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the trial of this case, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.