2. In light of the above, a favorable circumstance is recognized, such as the fact that the Defendant led to the instant crime and reflects his mistake, partly repaid the interest, and that the Defendant’s imprisonment with prison labor through confinement for a period of about three months seems to have been ensured and had an opportunity for self-esteem; that the Defendant suffered urology and is not good and health; and that the Defendant is living with good faith without re-offending.

However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the money by actively deceiving the financial power of the victim and his parents even though the defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay by taking advantage of the personal trust relationship with the victim, and the nature of the crime is not good. The defrauded of this case was committed five times, and the amount of damage was committed through the fraud of this case reaches 11,850,00 won in total, up to the trial, there was no circumstance where the principal was repaid up to the trial, and there was no other circumstance where the principal was repaid up to the trial, and all other sentencing conditions, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., are considered to be disadvantageous and unfair. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.