1. On May 22, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim according to the noise level of the victim D (e.g., the age of 45) in front of the coffee shop in the “C” case where the Defendant was in the original city B on May 22, 2019.

2. In relation to the fact that the victim E (the 40-year-old) who was working in D’s place at the date, time, time, and place specified in Paragraph 1, laid down the Defendant’s resistance, the Defendant brought about an injury to the Defendant, at the price of the victim’s head one time due to the enormous dust, which is a dangerous object, where approximately two weeks of treatment is open for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and D;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records, such as field photographs, reports on investigation, photographs taken on the scene, diagnostic records, and tools and photographs used by the suspect for committing the crime;

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1), and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Among concurrent crimes, there are favorable circumstances to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act partially repents his mistake, etc. However, each of the crimes of this case has been committed in the same manner, in light of the method and result of the crime, and the nature and circumstances of the crime, and the fact that no agreement has been reached between the victims even after the lapse of a certain period after the crime, and all other circumstances, such as the motive and circumstance of each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, occupation, family relation, health status, etc., shall be determined as per the disposition.