beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2018.07.03 2018고정165

공문서부정행사등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 High 165"

1. On April 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obtained a copy of the welfare card owned by the victim B at the bus stops near the south-dong-gu bus stops located in the south-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. On April 28, 2017, the Defendant, at the ticket office in the name of sealing as indicated in paragraph (1) around April 17:4, 2017, issued free tickets by means of recognizing that the above B’s welfare card, which was acquired in the name of the Gyeongnam-do mayor as indicated in paragraph (1), was put on the identification card of the automatic ticket sales machine at that place.

Accordingly, the defendant did not use the welfare card of B, which is an official document issued by the Yangyang-do mayor.

On June 1, 2017, the Defendant committed assault against the victim, such as: (a) in front of the front of the front of the fluorial studal 51, south-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, and (b) in front of the fluoral 51; (c) on the ground that the victim C ( South, 43 years of age) was sleeped in the same place as the Defendant; (d) by putting the fluor’s disease, which is a dangerous object located on the floor; and (e) by putting the fluor’s disease at the bottom; and (e) putting the fluor’s disease at the center, b

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 High Court Decision 165]

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Existing existence of one (No. 1) a welfare card for the disabled that has been seized (No. 2018 ancient 166);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (not more than 18 pages of evidence records);

1. Article 360(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 360(1) of the Act on the Selection of Criminal Punishment (a crime of embezzlement of deserted articles in possession), Article 230 of the Criminal Act (a crime of unlawful uttering of official document), Articles 261 and 260 of the Criminal Act.