When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a D driving school in the Gu and the victim E is a person who operates a F driving school within a distance of about 100 meters from the above driving school from January 2014, and is competing with each other.

Around March 30, 2016, the Defendant’s title “unfford truth-finding” is called “unffordly truth-finding” with a large number of cell phoness, such as examination students G, which had been consulted at a private teaching institute operated by the Defendant on or around March 30, 2016, with respect to a private teaching institute operated by the Victim, and passed the two-year short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term short-term, 3) through March 4).

The reduction of tuition fees is due to the saving of tuition fees, five years thereafter;

The text message was sent with the content of "the reduction of students".

However, in fact, from among the students of the private teaching institute operating victims, the first successful candidates were 6 in the year 2014 and 18 in the year 2015, and the expenses such as tuition fees and the amount of book value received from the private teaching institute operating victims were 1.8 million won per year and more than 1.27 billion won per year, which is the expenses of the private teaching institute operating the defendant, but the above expenses are reduced under the pretext of discount, etc., and the above expenses actually amount to 1.3 million won or 1.5 million won, and the second examination lecture for the victim's private teaching institute begins from 1.3 months, not from 3 months, and the fact that the second examination lecture for the victim's private teaching institute was combined with the P.

Nevertheless, the Defendant spreads false facts as above and interfered with the operation of the FSC by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel wanted to send a letter to the victim who will help the subjects in selecting a private teaching institute in this case, and only refers to the victim's private teaching institute or spreads false facts.