2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to the defendants' acknowledgement of the defendants' mistake, the defendants committed a crime of this case with a considerable number of victims, and there are additional agreements with some victims in the case of defendants A even after they reached the trial. However, the defendants committed each crime of this case in an intelligent and planned manner with a convenience point for employees at night, by sharing their roles and roles in advance, with a view to various convenience points across the nation. The number and duration of the defendants committed the crime of this case is reasonable, and the amount of fraud is not much significant, and there are many kinds of penalties for the same crime of this case. The defendants committed several crimes of this case, which are punished for the same kind of crime of this case, and they were released from prison after being sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months, and the defendants Eul was released from prison after being sentenced to imprisonment for ten months. In full view of all the circumstances that the defendants committed each crime of this case during the period of repeated crime, the degree of participating in the crime of this case and profit distribution, age, character and conduct, circumstances, methods and results of the crime of this case, etc.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.