If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On January 20, 2016, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in the court of first instance on the criminal case against violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Act No. 1385, Jan. 20, 2016) against B opened in the court of Seoul Central District Court 514, which was located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul,

Defendant, despite that the Defendant’s repeated sending of abusive language and Intimidation letters to C was not the Defendant, but the Defendant was a woman-friendly Gu of all women of the Defendant,

A. The witness gives testimony “A” at the public prosecutor’s examination of “I am sypty,” “I am sypty,” and gives testimony to the prosecutor’s question, “I am sypt. witness,” and “I am sypt. witness, I am sypty,” and

B. In the prosecutor’s newspaper, “Any person who sent such words and “C” was an employee of Da, who works for this issue, and there was an appraisal to see that he/she works for him/her as well as for this issue, and the head of the team (C) told him/her in such a form as “I cannot make a speech within the company,” but without any reason, he/she told him/her in such form as “I cannot say that the head of the team (C) would be able to flickly flickly flick.” On the other hand, he/she did not have any harm to the company. On the other hand, the method how the head of the team was the company, so how the flick flicked flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick fl, so that he/she sent the flick flick flick with the phone.”

(c) the witness bears the testimony “for example,” with respect to the prosecutor’s examination that “44 or 444 this number has been set up by the sending number, and C CC CC teblon that the witness sent to Defendant B’s handphone,” and

D. "Witness" is a cell phone of the defendant (B).