The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court or the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted all the Defendants of the instant facts charged (excluding the portion of acquittal of Defendants A and B agricultural partnership) on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a fine is imposed on Defendant F, the argument that the amount of punishment is unreasonable is not

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.